MUSTAQILLIK DAVRI NASHRLARIGA ASOSLANGAN DIAXRON KORPUS YARATISHNING LINGVISTIK TA’MINOTI
Keywords:
diachronic corpus, linguistic support, historical texts, morphological analysis, lemmatization, normalization.Abstract
This article explores the creation of a diachronic corpus based on publications from the independence period and its linguistic support. The study analyzes the significance of a diachronic corpus in examining linguistic changes in the Uzbek language after independence. Additionally, it discusses the digitization of historical texts, morphological and syntactic annotation technologies, methods for identifying lexical changes, and the process of developing linguistic resources. The relevance of the study lies in the fact that publications from the independence period have not yet been analyzed from a linguistic perspective.
References
1. Biber D. Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 1993. 8(4), 243-257.
2. Elov B.B., Xusainova Z.Y., Xudayberganov N.U. Oʻzbek tili korpusi matnlari uchun tf-idf statistik koʻrsatkichni hisoblash. Maqola: 2023: 1783-1784
3. Gries S.T. Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Routledge. 2009.
4. Jurafsky D. and Martin J.H. Speech and Language Processing (3rd ed.) Pearson. 2021.
5. Kilgarriff A. and Grefenstette G. Introduction to the Special Issue on the Web as Corpus. Computational Linguistics, 2003. 333-347.
6. Kuznetsov I. Russian National Corpus: Structure and Applications. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, 2014. 781-795.
7. McEnery T. and Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
8. Rissanen M. The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: A Diachronic Perspective on English Syntax. Language and Computers, 2000. 30(1), 21-42.
9. Sinclair J. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press. 1991.
10. Stubbs M. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Blackwell Publishing. 2001.
